Women are More Shallow Than Men
Question:
Alvin wrote: > When you compare the two sexes, men are at an extreme disadvantage > when it comes to single life and dating. The main problem is that > women are more shallow than men. Yes, the whole rhetoric that she > just wants a man with a good heart can be tossed out the window. > And it is only getting worse. I chat online, and it seems like more > women message me immediately asking if I have a pic. > Gotta pic? Yea, and I’m fucking ugly, bitch. Still want one?
Moot point. Most guys would ask for a pic too. I chat online and it’s nice to see who you are talking to. And regardless of sex, physical attraction is one of the first things that draws you in to see if theres more. > Of course, women refuse to view themselves as shallow and cold. They > will still say that that the inside is what counts, personality, > intelligence. Yet, if you polled most women, they would admit that > physical attraction is a must.
Some women are shallow and cold,,just as some of us guys. Also if you polled most guys they would say the same thing, physical attraction is a must. > The sad fact is that men are not near as shallow when it comes to > physical requirements. A woman will reject a man immediately for the > most minor physical flaw, yet I don’t know a guy that would turn down > a date with a nice looking lady because say, she had small sized > breasts. I believe that most men find the majority of women out > there attractive. Even the plain jane girl out there is attractive. > You just don’t hear of many girls becoming old maids because they are > not asked out. Heck, even girls with disabilities probably get more > dates than the average joe.
Women look at men differently than men look at women,,us guys are more sexually driven, its our nature. > Men are on the opposite end of the spectrum. If physical attraction > is a must, what do women consider physically attractive? This > question will always remain a great mystery because every single women > on the planet has a varying degree of attraction factors. Therefore, > most guys will face some possibility of rejection with woman that > they approach. You may be a good looking dude, but you do not possess > her own unique attraction factors. And no matter how hard you try on > the date, she will reward you with indifference, or "you’re a nice > guy". Or even worse, you need a combination of factors. For > example, I’m a hairy chested guy. Some women will regard that trait > as disgusting.. I’ve had women demand that I shave myself if I go > with them. Screw you. I’m not altering my physical being to satisfy > your attraction factor. On the other hand, there are women that find > my hair chest to be a turn on.
Everyone is different,,some like this and others like that. If the person in question doesn’t like you for whatever reason ,,then why pursue the matter. You can’t make someone want you. > No matter how you look, there is truly someone out there for everyone. > Some girl is attracted to your own special features. The problem is > the chances are slim that you will across paths with a girl that > desires your combination of factors. There are just so many variables > involved.
One of the main factors is being shy and not meeting the amounts of women that non-shy guys meet. Non-shy guys get shot down way more than we do just cause of the volume of women that they meet, and yes they have more success due to the same. You might as well move on if you don’t have that right combo > of factors. I even know some women that are turned off by body > builders and the Alpha types. There is just no way of winning. Only > a lucky roll.
Moving on is good,,why waste time. To me its not as much as do I have what she wants,,its does she have what I want. FiRe
Response:
"Alvin" <alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com… > No matter how you look, there is truly someone out there for everyone. > Some girl is attracted to your own special features. The problem is > the chances are slim that you will across paths with a girl that > desires your combination of factors. There are just so many variables > involved. You might as well move on if you don’t have that right combo > of factors.
Here’s where I disagree with you. I believe that for every man, there are X number of women that he would hit it off amazingly well with. The value of X varies from man to man; for some it’s a few dozen, for most it’s five or six, and for some (Aspergers men, the disabled, the morbidly obese, self-destructive starving artists with long rap sheets and short penises) it’s between zero and two.
Response:
Lash Rambo <lra…@obmarl.com> wrote in message <news:Xns953AD07F8ED55lramboobmarlcom@68.12.19.6>… > alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in > news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com: > <snip> > Assume for the sake of argument that you’re right, and women are shallower > than men. Then what? Where do you go from there? What do you get out of > the deal? How is the world a better place as a result of this observation?
Well for one, women need to be taught better. They grow up being daddy’s little girl, his princess, no man is too good for my baby, and their mom is telling them not to settle. They go into college feeling like freaking Cinderella deserving of gorgeous Prince Charming while learning that men can easily be manipulated with the power of sex. Just look at the wedding section in the newspaper. I usually see young very attractive couples. Women go for the bad boy hotties with the belief that they can tame them once they are married. As a result, the divorce rate is souring, and when a woman hits her late 30s with stretch marks, she learns that physical attraction does not amount to much.
Response:
alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com: > When you compare the two sexes, men are at an extreme disadvantage > when it comes to single life and dating. The main problem is that > women are more shallow than men. Yes, the whole rhetoric that she > just wants a man with a good heart can be tossed out the window. > And it is only getting worse. I chat online, and it seems like more > women message me immediately asking if I have a pic. > Gotta pic? Yea, and I’m fucking ugly, bitch. Still want one? > — clip —
Women always will make the choice who they mate with. You have to live with that. That is just the way it is. Men have the power of accepting their offer or not. If you wish to read more about this check the book: "Nice Guys And Players: Becoming the Man Women Want" by Rom Wills.
Response:
alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in news:d2ec46.0408040624.2d3d1c38@posting.google.com: > Well for one, women need to be taught better.
Oh for fuck’s sake just shut the hell up. For the sake of fuck. I don’t know what that means.
Response:
Eerieness of the Short-Distance Rodent wrote: > alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in > news:d2ec46.0408040624.2d3d1c38@posting.google.com: >>Well for one, women need to be taught better. > Oh for fuck’s sake just shut the hell up. For the sake of fuck. I don’t > know what that means.
Its Federation of Undesirable and Cuckolded Knights. -M
Response:
"Eerieness of the Short-Distance Rodent" <a…@at.org> wrote in news:Xns953B4E083339Efkjdlkvjcxoiuarepoij@68.6.19.6: > alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in > news:d2ec46.0408040624.2d3d1c38@posting.google.com: >> Well for one, women need to be taught better. > Oh for fuck’s sake just shut the hell up. For the sake of fuck. I > don’t know what that means.
Also good: For the love of FUCK!
Response:
alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in message
<news:d2ec46.0408040624.2d3d1c38@posting.google.com>… ** Lash Rambo ** >> Assume for the sake of argument that you’re right, >> and women are shallower than men. Then what? Where >> do you go from there? What do you get out of the deal? >> How is the world a better place as a result of this observation?
** Alvin ** > Well for one, women need to be taught better. They grow up being > daddy’s little girl, his princess, no man is too good for my baby,
<snip rest> You’re pulling your punch with this last part. For a stronger rant you want to say "no man is good enough for my baby". Here’s an old post of mine that might be useful for your future rants. ——————————————————————— Message-ID: dd95baf2.0302132035.4a615da0@posting.google.com From: Virgo Cluster (gamma_n…@yahoo.com) Subject: Re: i need a break Newsgroups: alt.support.shyness Date: 2003-02-13 20:35:30 PST Honey Bunny 0…@webtv.net (Honey B.) wrote in message <news:2037-3E4BDFF2-194@storefull-2317.public.lawson.webtv.net>… > this is pretty much a rant that ive posted. i dont really > expect anyone to respond favorably to it but i felt like > posting it and so i did.
I’m sorry, but you need to work on your rants! This rant barely rates one screaming William head out of five. http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Xns931AD885962E4willi…@206.172.150.14 I suppose I could google up some really good rants by meg, Kitz, William, Lisa, and yes, even ness, that you could learn from, but because I value my health I’ll refer you to these instead —-> 1womanscyberpersona (2000-12-02) http://groups.google.com/groups?th=1b1edf92f40f6220 Dave (2002-02-21) http://groups.google.com/groups?th=bd98e5e08ef52acb Sandra (2000-08-18) http://groups.google.com/groups?th=4458f848de48fbc6 Darkfalz (2002-08-22) [A sample from the grandmaster himself!] http://groups.google.com/groups?th=4bf47bb8c1c5ba3f ——————————————————————— Virgo Cluster "[The UK's 10 Greatest Eurovision Song Contest Flops] (#2) "The Bad Old Days", by Co-co — 11′th in Paris, 1978." << Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 162 >>
Response:
alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in news:d2ec46.0408040624.2d3d1c38@posting.google.com: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Lash Rambo <lra…@obmarl.com> wrote in message > <news:Xns953AD07F8ED55lramboobmarlcom@68.12.19.6>… >> alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in >> news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com: >> <snip> >> Assume for the sake of argument that you’re right, and women are >> shallower than men. Then what? Where do you go from there? What do >> you get out of the deal? How is the world a better place as a result >> of this observation? > Well for one, women need to be taught better. They grow up being > daddy’s little girl, his princess, no man is too good for my baby, and > their mom is telling them not to settle. They go into college feeling > like freaking Cinderella deserving of gorgeous Prince Charming while > learning that men can easily be manipulated with the power of sex.
What do you propose as an alternative "teaching?" Perhaps more importantly, how do you propose parents get their children to actually listen to them? :) Personally, I haven’t noticed those Cinderella fantasies a problem in most college women. In particular, college women seemed far more likely to date more or less within their social status than to hold out for some "Prince Charming" to reach down and pull her up a dozen rungs on the social ladder. Heck, it was in college that a woman actually hit on me for a change! > Just look at the wedding section in the newspaper. I usually see > young very attractive couples. Women go for the bad boy hotties with > the belief that they can tame them once they are married. As a > result, the divorce rate is souring,
Is it really? I thought it’d been holding steady for a while. Anyone have statistics on this? Virgo? > and when a woman hits her late > 30s with stretch marks, she learns that physical attraction does not > amount to much.
Nothing an unshallow man couldn’t look past, right?
Response:
JayCee <jc38…@wymnrevil.com> wrote in message <news:41106B8F.43CB66E3@wymnrevil.com>… > Well, it’s true that the average man finds the average woman within his > age group to be attractive, but the average woman finds the average man to > be repulsive. It’s probably also true that about 80% of women find only > 10% of men to be attractive. So women will continue to be shallow hoes > and hook up with men "attractive" men who abuse them and use them. Fucking > whores …
I have a theory about this. IMO women aren’t attracted to men, but to particular men – mainly their romantic interests. Men, OTOH, are different. They are sexually attracted to many women. Shooting Star
Response:
<lra…@obmarl.com> wrote in news:Xns953B8E7A9F530lramboobmarlcom@68.12.19.6: > "Eerieness of the Short-Distance Rodent" <a…@at.org> wrote in > news:Xns953B4E083339Efkjdlkvjcxoiuarepoij@68.6.19.6: >> alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in >> news:d2ec46.0408040624.2d3d1c38@posting.google.com: >>> Well for one, women need to be taught better. >> Oh for fuck’s sake just shut the hell up. For the sake of fuck. I >> don’t know what that means. — > Also good: For the love of FUCK!
Lash Rambo Yes, very good. — >Its Federation of Undesirable and Cuckolded Knights. >M
Hmmmm…
Response:
theinvinciblepu…@hotmail.com (Shooting Star) wrote in message <news:722d925b.0408041840.58a6b8c9@posting.google.com>… > JayCee <jc38…@wymnrevil.com> wrote in message <news:41106B8F.43CB66E3@wymnrevil.com>… > > Well, it’s true that the average man finds the average woman within his > > age group to be attractive, but the average woman finds the average man to > > be repulsive. It’s probably also true that about 80% of women find only > > 10% of men to be attractive. So women will continue to be shallow hoes > > and hook up with men "attractive" men who abuse them and use them. Fucking > > whores … > I have a theory about this. IMO women aren’t attracted to men, but to > particular men – mainly their romantic interests. Men, OTOH, are > different. They are sexually attracted to many women. > Shooting Star
lets not generalize……. you cant really force logic onto jaycee audrey
Response:
(Alvin) wrote > When you compare the two sexes, men are at an extreme disadvantage > when it comes to single life and dating. The main problem is that > women are more shallow than men.
I hate to surprise you dude, but we’re all pretty shallow. And you’re just proving that imo by turning women into the "enemy". Yes, the whole rhetoric that she > just wants a man with a good heart can be tossed out the window. > And it is only getting worse. I chat online, and it seems like more > women message me immediately asking if I have a pic.
LOL You would prefer men to ask you for a pic? Oddly enough more men used to mail me asking for a pic than women. – Michaela
Response:
michaelamackenzie05072…@yahoo.com (Michaela) wrote in news:3271bf15.0408050713.6e545a30@posting.google.com: > I hate to surprise you dude, but we’re all pretty shallow.
Why do you want to brush everyone with same stroke? ’we’re all manipulative’, ‘we’re all shallow’. Isn’t that rather meaningless? Yes we’re all bipeds, but can run faster than others, nonetheless. I mean, seriously.
Response:
gamma_n…@yahoo.com (Virgo Cluster) wrote in news:dd95baf2.0408041137.4bfc0d2f@posting.google.com: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in message > <news:d2ec46.0408040624.2d3d1c38@posting.google.com>… > ** Lash Rambo ** >>> Assume for the sake of argument that you’re right, >>> and women are shallower than men. Then what? Where >>> do you go from there? What do you get out of the deal? >>> How is the world a better place as a result of this observation? > ** Alvin ** >> Well for one, women need to be taught better. They grow up being >> daddy’s little girl, his princess, no man is too good for my baby, > <snip rest> > You’re pulling your punch with this last part. For a stronger > rant you want to say "no man is good enough for my baby". > Here’s an old post of mine that might be useful for your > future rants. > ——————————————————————— > Message-ID: dd95baf2.0302132035.4a615…@posting.google.com > From: Virgo Cluster (gamma_n…@yahoo.com) > Subject: Re: i need a break > Newsgroups: alt.support.shyness > Date: 2003-02-13 20:35:30 PST > Honey Bunny 0…@webtv.net (Honey B.) wrote in message > <news:2037-3E4BDFF2-194@storefull-2317.public.lawson.webtv.net>… >> this is pretty much a rant that ive posted. i dont really >> expect anyone to respond favorably to it but i felt like >> posting it and so i did. > I’m sorry, but you need to work on your rants! This rant barely > rates one screaming William head out of five. > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=Xns931AD885962E4willi…@206.172.1 > 50.14
Holy crap. It’s a meta-meta post–a post about a post about a post. I’m afraid to follow the links, lest I find out they’re meta posts, too! Aiiigggghhhhhhhhh!!!!!!! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I suppose I could google up some really good rants by meg, Kitz, > William, Lisa, and yes, even ness, that you could learn from, > but because I value my health I’ll refer you to these instead —-> > 1womanscyberpersona (2000-12-02) > http://groups.google.com/groups?th=1b1edf92f40f6220 > Dave (2002-02-21) > http://groups.google.com/groups?th=bd98e5e08ef52acb > Sandra (2000-08-18) > http://groups.google.com/groups?th=4458f848de48fbc6 > Darkfalz (2002-08-22) [A sample from the grandmaster himself!] > http://groups.google.com/groups?th=4bf47bb8c1c5ba3f > ——————————————————————— > Virgo Cluster > "[The UK's 10 Greatest Eurovision Song Contest Flops] (#2) > "The Bad Old Days", by Co-co — 11′th in Paris, 1978." > << Karl Shaw, "The Mammoth Book of Tasteless > Lists", Carroll & Graf Publishers, 1998, p. 162 >>
Response:
Eerieness of the Short-Distance Rodent wrote: > (Michaela) wrote >> I hate to surprise you dude, but we’re all pretty shallow. > Why do you want to brush everyone with same stroke? ’we’re all > manipulative’, ‘we’re all shallow’. Isn’t that rather meaningless? > Yes we’re all bipeds, but can run faster than others, nonetheless. I > mean, seriously.
You’re absolutely right. For were it true, you’d not have felt the need to respond. Love – Michaela
Response:
"Michaela" <michaelashouse> wrote in news:4112b21d.0@news1.mweb.co.za: > Eerieness of the Short-Distance Rodent wrote: >> (Michaela) wrote >>> I hate to surprise you dude, but we’re all pretty shallow. >> Why do you want to brush everyone with same stroke? ’we’re all >> manipulative’, ‘we’re all shallow’. Isn’t that rather meaningless? >> Yes we’re all bipeds, but can run faster than others, nonetheless. I >> mean, seriously. > You’re absolutely right. > For were it true, you’d not have felt the need to respond.
Not sure which ‘it’ you’re referring to, unless it’s my incessantly smug nature.
Response:
Eerieness of the Short-Distance Rodent wrote: > "Michaela" wrote >> Eerieness of the Short-Distance Rodent wrote: >>> (Michaela) wrote >>>> I hate to surprise you dude, but we’re all pretty shallow. >>> Why do you want to brush everyone with same stroke? ’we’re all >>> manipulative’, ‘we’re all shallow’. Isn’t that rather meaningless? >>> Yes we’re all bipeds, but can run faster than others, nonetheless. >>> I mean, seriously. >> You’re absolutely right. >> For were it true, you’d not have felt the need to respond. > incessantly> smug
Kindly refrain from putting those two words next to each other in a sentence. nature. – Michaela
Response:
alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in message <news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com>… > When you compare the two sexes, men are at an extreme disadvantage
whine deleted — > No matter how you look, there is truly someone out there for everyone. > Some girl is attracted to your own special features. The problem is > the chances are slim that you will across paths with a girl that > desires your combination of factors. There are just so many variables > involved. You might as well move on if you don’t have that right combo > of factors. I even know some women that are turned off by body > builders and the Alpha types. There is just no way of winning. Only > a lucky roll.
well – yeah! true for everybody … boys & girls h*
Response:
alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com: <snip> Assume for the sake of argument that you’re right, and women are shallower than men. Then what? Where do you go from there? What do you get out of the deal? How is the world a better place as a result of this observation?
Response:
> alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in > news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com: > <snip> Lash Rambo wrote: > Assume for the sake of argument that you’re right, and women are shallower > than men. Then what? Where do you go from there? What do you get out of > the deal? How is the world a better place as a result of this observation?
The purpose of the message was to vent, not to present a course of action, unless the course of action presented was to pull oneself out of the market in futility.
Response:
MCMLXVI <mar…@earthlink.net> wrote in news:z3XPc.8554$Jp6.7471@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net: >> alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com (Alvin) wrote in >> news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com: >> <snip> > Lash Rambo wrote: >> Assume for the sake of argument that you’re right, and women are >> shallower than men. Then what? Where do you go from there? What do >> you get out of the deal? How is the world a better place as a result >> of this observation? > The purpose of the message was to vent, not to present a course of > action, unless the course of action presented was to pull oneself out > of the market in futility.
He seemed to be trying to prove an assertion, and seemed to remain more or less calm throughout his post, so I assumed it was more than a simple vent.
Response:
Well, it’s true that the average man finds the average woman within his age group to be attractive, but the average woman finds the average man to be repulsive. It’s probably also true that about 80% of women find only 10% of men to be attractive. So women will continue to be shallow hoes and hook up with men "attractive" men who abuse them and use them. Fucking whores … – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Alvin wrote: > When you compare the two sexes, men are at an extreme disadvantage > when it comes to single life and dating. The main problem is that > women are more shallow than men. Yes, the whole rhetoric that she > just wants a man with a good heart can be tossed out the window. > And it is only getting worse. I chat online, and it seems like more > women message me immediately asking if I have a pic. > Gotta pic? Yea, and I’m fucking ugly, bitch. Still want one? > Of course, women refuse to view themselves as shallow and cold. They > will still say that that the inside is what counts, personality, > intelligence. Yet, if you polled most women, they would admit that > physical attraction is a must. > The sad fact is that men are not near as shallow when it comes to > physical requirements. A woman will reject a man immediately for the > most minor physical flaw, yet I don’t know a guy that would turn down > a date with a nice looking lady because say, she had small sized > breasts. I believe that most men find the majority of women out > there attractive. Even the plain jane girl out there is attractive. > You just don’t hear of many girls becoming old maids because they are > not asked out. Heck, even girls with disabilities probably get more > dates than the average joe. > Men are on the opposite end of the spectrum. If physical attraction > is a must, what do women consider physically attractive? This > question will always remain a great mystery because every single women > on the planet has a varying degree of attraction factors. Therefore, > most guys will face some possibility of rejection with woman that > they approach. You may be a good looking dude, but you do not possess > her own unique attraction factors. And no matter how hard you try on > the date, she will reward you with indifference, or "you’re a nice > guy". Or even worse, you need a combination of factors. For > example, I’m a hairy chested guy. Some women will regard that trait > as disgusting.. I’ve had women demand that I shave myself if I go > with them. Screw you. I’m not altering my physical being to satisfy > your attraction factor. On the other hand, there are women that find > my hair chest to be a turn on. > No matter how you look, there is truly someone out there for everyone. > Some girl is attracted to your own special features. The problem is > the chances are slim that you will across paths with a girl that > desires your combination of factors. There are just so many variables > involved. You might as well move on if you don’t have that right combo > of factors. I even know some women that are turned off by body > builders and the Alpha types. There is just no way of winning. Only > a lucky roll.
Response:
When you compare the two sexes, men are at an extreme disadvantage when it comes to single life and dating. The main problem is that women are more shallow than men. Yes, the whole rhetoric that she just wants a man with a good heart can be tossed out the window. And it is only getting worse. I chat online, and it seems like more women message me immediately asking if I have a pic. Gotta pic? Yea, and I’m fucking ugly, bitch. Still want one? Of course, women refuse to view themselves as shallow and cold. They will still say that that the inside is what counts, personality, intelligence. Yet, if you polled most women, they would admit that physical attraction is a must. The sad fact is that men are not near as shallow when it comes to physical requirements. A woman will reject a man immediately for the most minor physical flaw, yet I don’t know a guy that would turn down a date with a nice looking lady because say, she had small sized breasts. I believe that most men find the majority of women out there attractive. Even the plain jane girl out there is attractive. You just don’t hear of many girls becoming old maids because they are not asked out. Heck, even girls with disabilities probably get more dates than the average joe. Men are on the opposite end of the spectrum. If physical attraction is a must, what do women consider physically attractive? This question will always remain a great mystery because every single women on the planet has a varying degree of attraction factors. Therefore, most guys will face some possibility of rejection with woman that they approach. You may be a good looking dude, but you do not possess her own unique attraction factors. And no matter how hard you try on the date, she will reward you with indifference, or "you’re a nice guy". Or even worse, you need a combination of factors. For example, I’m a hairy chested guy. Some women will regard that trait as disgusting.. I’ve had women demand that I shave myself if I go with them. Screw you. I’m not altering my physical being to satisfy your attraction factor. On the other hand, there are women that find my hair chest to be a turn on. No matter how you look, there is truly someone out there for everyone. Some girl is attracted to your own special features. The problem is the chances are slim that you will across paths with a girl that desires your combination of factors. There are just so many variables involved. You might as well move on if you don’t have that right combo of factors. I even know some women that are turned off by body builders and the Alpha types. There is just no way of winning. Only a lucky roll.
Response:
"Alvin" <alvinstraigh…@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d2ec46.0408031431.7099358d@posting.google.com… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> When you compare the two sexes, men are at an extreme disadvantage > when it comes to single life and dating. The main problem is that > women are more shallow than men. Yes, the whole rhetoric that she > just wants a man with a good heart can be tossed out the window. > And it is only getting worse. I chat online, and it seems like more > women message me immediately asking if I have a pic. > Gotta pic? Yea, and I’m fucking ugly, bitch. Still want one? > Of course, women refuse to view themselves as shallow and cold. They > will still say that that the inside is what counts, personality, > intelligence. Yet, if you polled most women, they would admit that > physical attraction is a must. > The sad fact is that men are not near as shallow when it comes to > physical requirements. A woman will reject a man immediately for the > most minor physical flaw, yet I don’t know a guy that would turn down > a date with a nice looking lady because say, she had small sized > breasts. I believe that most men find the majority of women out > there attractive. Even the plain jane girl out there is attractive. > You just don’t hear of many girls becoming old maids because they are > not asked out. Heck, even girls with disabilities probably get more > dates than the average joe. > Men are on the opposite end of the spectrum. If physical attraction > is a must, what do women consider physically attractive? This > question will always remain a great mystery because every single women > on the planet has a varying degree of attraction factors. Therefore, > most guys will face some possibility of rejection with woman that > they approach. You may be a good looking dude, but you do not possess > her own unique attraction factors. And no matter how hard you try on > the date, she will reward you with indifference, or "you’re a nice > guy". Or even worse, you need a combination of factors. For > example, I’m a hairy chested guy. Some women will regard that trait > as disgusting.. I’ve had women demand that I shave myself if I go > with them. Screw you. I’m not altering my physical being to satisfy > your attraction factor. On the other hand, there are women that find > my hair chest to be a turn on. > No matter how you look, there is truly someone out there for everyone. > Some girl is attracted to your own special features. The problem is > the chances are slim that you will across paths with a girl that > desires your combination of factors. There are just so many variables > involved. You might as well move on if you don’t have that right combo > of factors. I even know some women that are turned off by body > builders and the Alpha types. There is just no way of winning. Only > a lucky roll.
Nice post, and 100% true.
